call of duty vs battlefield

When it comes to games one of the biggest genre out there is first person shooters(FPS), being around for probably more then 20 years, there has been a lot of them and today i will talk about 2 in particular, now i haven't played too much of each series but people wanted it so without further ado its battlefield vs call of duty.

Out of the battlefield series iv'e only played 4 but i will tell that it is a very good game. the game play was very fun, however the multiplayer i s where these game shined, playing against other people in tanks helicopters and all that made for a lot of fun and memorable moments.

Now i Call of Duty to me was was about two teams fighting each other for common goals, the game can be fun and some of the games were great, however most of them were boring. Black Ops 2 for example had good game play but for some reason the game was always boring after 10 minutes that being said thought the game offered very good modes and i can see why many people enjoy it.

Well whats better, to me battlefield simply because battlefield was more open and you could do much more in the game which made it more fun, call of duty to me just was too limited so it made it boring. Thank you very much and please feel free to post your opinion in the comment section.

Mario vs Sonic

In the 90's there was no bigger video game rivalry then the two mascots in the 16 bit consoles wars then Mario and Sonic , however since they've had so many spin off games ill be sticking to there main series, super Mario bros and sonic the hedgehog.

The super Mario bros series revolutionized platforming with the most amazing idea ever side scrolling, the screen can move OMG! released on the NES as a launch title, super Mario bros had smooth game play great fast paced action, awesome power ups cool bosses, difficult levels and was just plain fun for me challenging, but very fun.

Sonic the hedgehog was specifically made to compete with Mario, The inspiration came from trying to beat super Mario bros first level as fast as you could possibly could so sonic was made to be very fast the game is all about super fast platforming and quick second reaction, it was very fun, had good game play, interesting levels and very fun bosses.

well to me super Mario bros is better not because of the games because to me there equal but super Mario bros was the one to revolutionized gaming and because sonic is no longer popular but Mario is still thriving as we speak and sonic did not really do that much for gaming so i'm not saying sonic is a bad game but Mario to me is just better.

This battle isent about which game is better but its a coll video andshows who would win in a fight i recomend whatching it.

the battle of fnaf

Ah five nights at Freddy's, a game series that somehow got a really crazed fandom and 4 games in less than one year might be one of the most overrated game ever, that being said this series to me were best at its first 2 games, but which one do i think is better well lets look at each separate first. the first game was defiantly more eerie had more darkness in my oppinion, the first game to me was meant to be a strategy game and was suppose to make you feel helpless as all you can do is hope you make it trough the night because at least for me you couldn't really do much to survive so i think it was a very well made survival game. fnaf 2 gave us all we wanted in a sequel, more cameras, more danger and more mystery's. this game changed the formula of the first by making it all about quick reflexes and fast paced game play and here are more things out to get you. This game is much more difficult in my opinion, this game did not really up the scare factor, but added a difficulty and most importantly more story elements in the game. Well i believe that fnaf 1 is better because out of the 2 and even out of all the games it did more of what a horror game should be, give a creepy eerie feeling which to me that makes it a better horror game.

check out both game trailers